A discussion paper from the Australia Institute, disseminated by Ecorecycle Victoria suggests that total wasteful consumption in Australia amounts to over A$10.5 billion dollars annually spent on goods and services that are never or hardly ever used. Types of wasting behaviour are identified, and typical patterns of consumption highlighted in order to better understand Australia as a consumer society
This paper is the first to explore the phenomenon of wasteful consumption in Australia. It is based on a national survey of 1644 respondents carried out by Roy Morgan Research in November 2004. The survey was designed to assess the extent of behaviour that can be defined as wasteful consumption together with its prevalence among different types of households and individuals. It also set out to understand some of the attitudes associated with wasteful consumption.
The survey asked respondents to estimate their expenditure on the goods and services they purchase but do not use and their attitudes to spending on things that go unused. When aggregated across all of the items included in the survey, on average each Australian household wasted A$1226 on items purchased but unused in 2004. This is approximately equal to one month‘‘s repayments on an average Australian home mortgage. Total wasteful consumption amounts to over A$10.5 billion dollars annually spent on goods and services that are never or hardly ever used. By way of comparison, this amount exceeds spending by Australian governments on universities and roads. This assessment of the extent of wasteful consumption is likely to be a significant underestimate, both because some major items were not included in the survey (excessively large houses, rarely used holiday homes and caravans and second cars), and because there is evidence that respondents appear to have understated the extent of their wasteful consumption.
Australians can be divided broadly into four types according to the amount of wasteful consumption they engage in and their attitudes to spending on goods they do not use. The four types are as follows.
Guilty wasters: accounting for around 14 per cent of the population, these are people who say they feel guilty when they buy things they do not use but are wasters nevertheless.
Who cares wasters: also accounting for around 14 per cent of the population, these are people who say they are not bothered about spending money on goods and services they don‘‘t use. Whether big wasters or not, they are relaxed about buying things that are not subsequently used
In-denial wasters: accounting for around 15 per cent of the population, indenial wasters are those who waste a lot but say they hardly ever buy things that don‘‘t get used. ·
Saints: these are Australians who waste little, think carefully about how much use they are going to get out of the things they buy and feel guilty when they do waste things. Around 40 per cent of Australians fall into this category.
Spending by Australian households on the main areas of waste surveyed is reported. Food accounts for most wasteful consumption. Overall Australians threw The Australia Institute viii away A$2.9 billion of fresh food, $630 million of uneaten take-away food, $876 million of leftovers, $596 million of unfinished drinks and A$241 million of frozen food, a total of A$5.3 billion on all forms of food in 2004. This represents more than 13 times the A$386 million donated by Australian households to overseas aid agencies in 2003.
Analysis of wasteful consumption by demographic characteristics reveals that:
· young people waste more than older people. Wasteful consumption of food, for instance, falls sharply as age increases. Among 18-24 year olds, 38 per cent admit to wasting more than A$30 on fresh food per fortnight, whereas only seven per cent of people aged 70 or over admit to similar levels of waste
· househ
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!