Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
In the US state of Wisconsin, the Barron County Board of Supervisors wants the state Natural Resources Board to reconsider its classification of the county’s waste-to-energy incinerator at Almena. The reason is to save around US$7,000 pa in licensing fees.
The Barron News Shield reports that when the county built the waste-to-energy facility in 1986, it was hailed by legislators and state officials as the wave of the future and a replacement for landfills, which were being ordered closed. Since 1986, the incinerator has processed approximately 32,000 tons of municipal solid waste per year for the purpose of disposing of the waste and, at the same time, creating energy in the form of steam used by an adjacent cheese plant.
Since then, the Natural Resources Board has rewritten its administrative rules and reclassified the incinerator as a “municipal waste combustor.” The category of Municipal Waste Combustor did not exist in 1986, and the facility was classified as an “incinerator,” exempt from license fees under section NR 520.15(3) Table 2; Footnote 3, which provides: “The department shall waive the plan review fees and license fees for a processing facility or incinerator which has a primary purpose of converting sold waste into usable materials, products or energy.”
The exemption does not apply to the category of “Municipal Waste Combustor.”
The county contends that its facility is clearly an “incinerator” that has the primary purpose of converting solid waste into usable materials, products or energy. The county wants the Department of Natural Resources Board to modify the rules section to include Municipal Waste Combustor as a category of facility exempt from licensing fees.
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...