Toronto homeowners will feel it in the wallet if they put out more than a bag of garbage every two weeks if measures approved unanimously yesterday by a key city committee win council approval next month. The Toronto Globe & Mail reports that under new user fee rules slated for mid-2008, the average Toronto household would pay an extra C$62 a year. Those who fail to recycle would pay more, while dedicated recyclers would see costs rise less quickly.
The new "pay-as-you-throw" strategy is part of a wide-ranging package, including the extension of green bin organic recycling for high-rises starting in mid-2008, adopted by the executive committee to divert 70 per cent of city waste from landfill by 2010, up from 42 per cent today. But several critics denounced the new fee as an extra tax on homeowners.
Under the proposal, homeowners would select one of four garbage bins to be supplied by the city, with fees tied to the size. Instead of including garbage collection in the overall property tax, the city would charge a separate levy to spur recycling.
Citing similar efforts in other cities, including Vancouver, city officials assume a household that actively recycles needs only a 75-litre bin, equivalent to one large green garbage bag, and would pay no extra charge. A household that uses a 120-litre "cart," equivalent to 11/2 green garbage bags, would pay C$41 a year more than the current average bill of C$209 a year.
Larger households that need a 240-litre cart, the equivalent of three bags, would pay an extra C$101 a year, while those who need the largest cart, 360 litres (or 41/2 bags) would pay an extra C$151 a year. The city lacks the authority to take garbage collection off the property tax, but would levy the proposed new fees and provide rebates
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!