Court reinstates Illinois incinerator subsidy

Illinois, USA can no longer deny subsidies for a trio of bond-financed waste-to-energy incinerators in the state, a judge said this week in a ruling that may allow the incinerators to seek monetary damages against the state and an electric utility.



Reuters reports that Cook County Circuit Court Judge Robert Boharic ruled that a 1996 Illinois law that yanked the subsidy cannot be retroactively applied to projects that were already under way at the time the law was enacted. He added that he planned to enter a permanent injunction against the application of the law to the incinerators that sued Commonwealth Edison, a unit of Exelon Corp. , and the state of Illinois over the matter.



Boharic’s ruling came more than six years after incinerator developers filed their lawsuits challenging the state Legislature’s repeal of the Retail Rate Act that was spurred by intense lobbying by environmental activists. The act had enabled incinerators to sell electricity they generated to Commonwealth Edison at a higher-than-market rate. The electric utility then became eligible for tax credits equal to the difference between the higher rates and market rates.



The incinerator developers, who had largely depended on the higher rates to pay off nearly US$500 million of unrated, tax-exempt revenue bonds, claimed the retroactive repeal of the act was unconstitutional.

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...