Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Here is an interesting item from the California Integrated Waste Management Board, addressing the issues of cultural diversity and resource recovery, sometimes a sensitive issue for waste planners.
Understanding California’s growing cultural diversity and the impact increasingly diverse communities may have on waste stream reduction and diversion programs could be key to the state’s long-term efforts to reduce waste disposal in landfills.
California State University, Sacramento, Professor Dennis H. Tootelian has completed a study of Minority Communities and the Waste Stream–commissioned by the California Integrated Waste Management Board in June 2001, examining the relationship between cultural diversity and the success of local waste diversion programmes. The study draws a number of modest conclusions about diversity and the waste stream, but more importantly, outlines several issues that need further analysis “if diversion rates are to rise, diverse populations are to be served appropriately, and environmental justice is to be achieved,” concludes Tootelian.
The study analysed diversity and waste diversion activities and rates in five geographic regions: the Bay Area (Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara counties), San Francisco County, the greater Sacramento Area (El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento counties), Los Angeles County, and Orange County. The report can be downloaded directly from the Waste Board’s web site.
Since 1990, California communities have diverted over 200 million tons of resources away from landfills. The statewide diversion rate in 2001 was 42 percent and the Waste Board so far has determined that 205 of 445 reporting jurisdictions–cities, counties, and regional agencies–have met the state’s 50 percent diversion goal, or made a “good faith effort” to do so.
Summary conclusions
Jurisdictions with large waste streams tend to have higher diversion rates
There are strong indications that jurisdictions with more diverse populations have smaller waste streams than do those with less diverse populations
There are few, if any, differences in the types of waste streams generated by diverse and nonminority populations
Highly diverse populations present significant opportunities for jurisdictions that seek to improve their diversion rates
The factors that directly affect diversion rates are not well established
The number of waste reduction programs does not appear to be directly related to diversion rates
Grant funding does not show clear lines of benefit
Copies of the report The Study of Minority Communities and the Waste Stream (0.3MB) can be collected from CIWMB’s website at: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Publications/LocalAsst/30002020.pdf
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...