Europe – Commission proposes strategy to deal with mercury pollution including a ban on exports

The European Commission has proposed a comprehensive strategy against mercury pollution. High doses of mercury and its compounds can be fatal, but even relatively low amounts can seriously harm the nervous system. There is evidence that mercury pollution, in particular where it exceeds the international accepted safety levels, for example in fish, still affects the health of some European citizens. The commission strategy proposes a series of actions to cut EU and global emissions and use of mercury, including phasing out EU mercury exports by 2011. It also addresses safe storage of mercury decommissioned by EU industry.



Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said: "We are determined to take action to reduce emissions of this poison. We will take steps to reduce the demand for mercury products inside the EU. We will also take the lead in tackling the global pool of mercury that exists in our environment. The EU is the biggest global exporter of mercury and we have a responsibility to phase out this trade all together."



Tackling the mercury problem EU legislation has reduced use and emissions of mercury in Europe over recent decades. However, there are still high levels of exposure among some European consumers of fish and seafood in which mercury accumulates. This is a particular problem for people living in Mediterranean costal regions

Globally, there are continuing high levels of mercury demand – for which the EU is presently the main supplier. The strategy, therefore, sets out a series of objectives and actions:



· Banning mercury exports by 2011

· Global action – input to international activities and cooperation with other countries, eg to control mercury trade, emissions, and use in activities like gold mining. · Reducing EU demand – restricting the marketing of measuring devices containing mercury (eg thermometers), and further investigation of remaining uses (e.g. dental amalgam)

· Addressing EU surpluses – safe storage of mercury decommissioned by industry, and further study of mercury already circulating in society (eg in old products still in use)

· Reducing EU emissions – review of the effects of current EU law, provision of information to support further emission cuts in Member States, and study of additional control of releases from coal burning

· Protecting against EU exposure

· further investigation of dietary exposure for women of child-bearing age and children, and provision of additional advice on mercury in food

· Improving understanding – research to fill key gaps in mercury knowledge.



Background



Mercury is a natural element, and the total amount that exists cannot be changed. However, human activities can release mercury from relatively stable deposits, allowing it to move through air, water and the food chain, and to convert into more toxic compounds. The main human sources are activities that release the natural mercury content of raw materials (e.g. burning coal), and use of mercury in products (e.g. thermometers) and processes (e.g. gold mining).



The Commission carried out a public stakeholder consultation, and produced an Extended Impact Assessment to identify the most appropriate policies balancing environmental, social and economic effects. The strategy will be presented to the Council and the European Parliament. It also provides the basis of an EU position for international discussion of mercury in the February 2005 Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)>>

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...