Europe – European Court decision re-opens definition of waste debate

A recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgement has apparently rekindled the confusion regarding the definition of the recovery of waste, according to the Chartered Institute of Wastes Management (CIWM).



This decision relates to the status of slurry as a waste in Spain.



In coming to its conclusions regarding Spain‘‘s failure to control this slurry under the Waste Framework Directive (Case C-416/02), the ECJ concluded that livestock effluent may fall outside classification as waste? if applied to the land in certain circumstances.



The judgement is being interpreted by some as having an impact on industries other than the agricultural sector, re-opening the debate on whether by-products should be categorised as waste. This, in turn, determines whether or not waste controls have to apply to their re-use, recycling or recovery and, therefore, the attractiveness of the material to another user.



CIWM deputy chief executive Chris Murphy comments: ‘‘Having heard directly from Defra, CIWM does not believe that this judgement means waste controls should be dis-applied to a broad range of by-products. Others have clearly been left with this impression. We need further clarification or a definitive statement from Defra or the EU to show how the decision does or does not affect other sectors or waste streams. It is already hard enough for waste managers or waste producers to understand and work with definitions of what is or is not waste. More fog? is the last thing we need

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...