Following the fate of waste – but should paper be recycled or burnt?

Paper should be incinerated rather than recycled, say Danish researchers, where burning paper would benefit the Danish economy. Across Europe, a new waste regulation requires EU countries to collect, analyse and report on waste data.



EDIE reports that although Danish politicians have set targets to recycle 60% of household paper and cardboard and 75% from businesses, Denmark’s Environmental Assessment Institute (IMV) says that recycling paper is not necessarily the best alternative for the environment or the economy. The country would be better served by burning paper collected for recycling, which would generate DKr10 million because the market price for paper is lower than that for coal, according to IMV’s calculations. In terms of benefiting the environment, paper incineration, a carbon dioxide neutral process, would reduce CO2 emissions otherwise generated from coal, says IMV.



European paper industry group CEPI recently argued against EU regulations on solid recovered fuels that would encourage the burning of paper rather than recycling it. A separate report sets the starting date for new EU regulations requiring statistics to be collected on waste generation and disposal. The statistics will be used to track the use of resources and establish whether waste prevention is being implemented.



From the start of next year, countries will have to carry out surveys and statistical analyses on the fate of waste from businesses and households. Firms with fewer than ten employees will be excluded from surveys unless they generate large amounts of waste. By the end of 2004, countries will have to have collected the first set of data and by 2007, the European Commission will have to present a compilation of statistics to the European Parliament and Council.

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...