Germans still bin their batteries

Germans still bin their batteries

Germany is the only country – to the best of my knowledge – where it is actually illegal to throw a dead battery into the rubbish bin. This unenforceable law means that lots of householders in Germany must be criminals as many tons of toxic heavy metals from batteries and accumulators are still finding their way into the environment unchecked – because batteries containing hazardous materials are not disposed of properly.

The German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA) reports that although it is prohibited, about 50 per cent of spent batteries are still disposed of as household waste. The President of the Federal Environmental Agency, Prof. Dr. Andreas Troge, recently reminded both citizens and dealers that “used batteries and accumulators do not belong in household waste” and to “have them disposed of by specialist dealers or at battery collection points. This is a positive step towards protecting the environment.”

Since 1998 the Battery Ordinance has required all citizens to dispose of spent batteries exclusively through dealers or at collection points especially set up for that purpose (legal obligation to return). Dealers and manufacturers are obliged to take back these batteries and to properly recycle or dispose of them as hazardous waste.

In 2001 only 40 per cent of all batteries sold were returned. This means that batteries are still being disposed of as household waste. This is confirmed in a study conducted on behalf of GRS (a foundation guaranteeing uniform and nationwide collection of spent batteries in Germany). In violation of legal regulations, about 100 grams of batteries per capita wound up in household refuse in 2001. This is dangerous to the environment, declares the UBA.

A particular problem is posed by batteries and accumulators containing heavy metals, such as mercury oxide (HgO) button cells and nickel cadmium (NiCd) accumulators. HgO button cells are used in watches and pocket calculators, and NiCd accumulators are used as rechargeable batteries in entertainment electronics (in portable cassette and CD players, for example) or in accumulator-operated domestic and do-it-yourself appliances.

Mercury oxide button cells contain 20-40% mercury, and NiCd accumulators are made up of about 20% cadmium. Both heavy metals are highly toxic and also have an impact on the food chain. The mercury content of a single button cell, if spread, is enough to contaminate 800,000 liters of water at levels above the limit value for drinking water. Mercury damages the nervous system; cadmium can cause damage to the kidneys and bones and is classified as carcinogenic.

A ban on the sale of mercury oxide cells has been in force since mid-2001. Batteries may now only contain 0.0005% mercury whereas button cells may contain up to 2%. Nevertheless, 21 tons (t) were still sold in 2001. Since the rate of return for button cells is only around 10% of sales volume, the whereabouts of some six tons of mercury is unknown.

The rate of reclamation for NiCd accumulators was about 45% in 2001. With a sales volume of about 3,000 t, this means that almost 300 t of cadmium are not disposed of properly.

The cadmium concentrations present in the environment are in part already above unobjectionable levels. Once cadmium is in the environment it can not be degraded. Any further contamination should therefore be avoided.

A 100% rate of reclamation for sold batteries does not seem feasible in the long term. A limit value for cadmium in batteries and accumulators would therefore be the surest way of avoiding cadmium inputs into the environment. A discussion at EU level on limiting cadmium content to .002% as of 2008 was already underway in 2001.<>

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...