Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Germany – cost analysis for the monitoring of NiCd batteries in municipal solid waste
Development of a monitoring strategy and assessment of related costs
The Germany EPA has issued a useful small report Cost analysis for the monitoring of NiCd batteries in municipal solid waste – development of a monitoring strategy and assessment of related costs.
The proposal of the European Commission for a Directive on batteries and accumulators intends to establish a collection rate of 80 % for spent portable nickel-cadmium batteries (hereinafter referred to as NiCd-batteries). Pursuant to Article 6, the collection rate shall be monitored by annual determination of the quantities of spent NiCd-batteries in municipal solid waste (MSW) .
The quantities of NiCd-batteries collected separately or sorted out in treatment plants are available from the established battery collection schemes. The quantities disposed of in the municipal solid waste have to be determined by investigation of the waste streams that contain relevant amounts of NiCd-batteries. The objective of the study is to assess the efforts and costs that would be necessary to monitor NiCd-batteries in MSW.
The following work steps must be carried out:
Identification of relevant waste streams, i.e. waste streams containing relevant amounts of NiCd-batteries
Selection of appropriate sampling strategies for the relevant waste streams
Determination of the cost affecting factors of the sampling
Development of a sampling plan for the relevant waste streams
Assessment of the monitoring costs.
A monitoring system has to consider all waste streams that could contain relevant amounts of NiCd-batteries. However, a uniform definition of the term ‘‘municipal solid waste‘‘ does not exist in Germany. The comparison of national statistics and the waste balances of the German Bundesländer reveals differences with regard to the waste types covered by the term MSW: C&D waste, sewage sludge and specific industrial wastes for example are sometimes classified as MSW and sometimes not. According to its origin municipal solid waste can be assigned to ‘‘households‘‘, ‘‘commercial activities‘‘, and ‘‘public areas‘‘ (infrastructural waste).
Comprehensive definitions and delimitations with regard to municipal solid waste are set out in the guidelines for standardised waste analyses of the Bundesländer Brandenburg and Saxony. In the following, waste is classified according to the main categories used in the waste balances of the Länder. For those categories a reliable database is available.
About 2,000 tonnes of NiCd-batteries are either contained in municipal solid waste or temporarily stored in German households and companies. They are assumed to be distributed among different waste streams as follows:
about 1,106 tonnes are assigned to household waste and bulky waste
72 tonnes to lightweight packaging from DSD-collection
280 tonnes in commercial waste
144 tonnes in WEEE (remaining quantity after removal of batteries)
About 55 tonnes are distributed among other waste types
200 tonnes are assumed to be stored in households and companies, or exported.
The sampling of waste bins at the premises and the sampling at waste treatment facilities have proven to be the most suitable sampling approaches. For both methods, the costaffecting parameters were determined. The very low proportion of NiCd-batteries and the heterogeneous mass distribution of particles in the waste stream clearly show the strongest impact on the survey costs.
The sorting and reprocessing steps in waste treatment plants result in a accumulation and homogenisation in the NiCd-relevant output streams of the plants. A higher share of NiCdbatteries and a reduction of particle sizes in the output streams
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...