Federal Environmental Agency publishes statistics for 2004
The volume of imported waste requiring a license has once again seen a sharp increase to a level of 6.5 million tons (Mt) in 2004. As compared to the previous year, imports rose by 1.6 Mt; that is, by roughly 33 per cent.
A reversal of the trend is expected for 2005, however, due to the Ordinance on Environmentally Compatible Storage of Waste from Human Settlements and on Biological Waste-Treatment Facilities (German: Abfallablagerungsverordnung) which ensures that waste imports will decline in future. The exported volume of waste requiring a license exceeded the 1 Mt mark. Slight increases are expected in the next few years.
Municipal waste from Italy and Austria represented a particularly high fraction of the rise in imported waste, along with treated wood and– as in previous years- sorted waste and other mixed materials from the Netherlands. In addition, imports for storage to landfills have increased sharply.
The high costs of disposal, charged in the form of landfill taxes in neighboring states, especially the Netherlands, existed alongside market-driven low prices for imported wastes at German landfills and waste incineration installations. Landfills with inadequate technical equipment that had to be closed down by June 2005 in accordance with the Abfallablagerungsverordnung were accepting as much waste as possible at very low prices. Waste incineration facilities would not have nearly reached capacity by June 2005 without additional waste imported at very low prices.
Since June 2005 sub-standard landfills have been decommissioned and now even high-standard landfills may only accept pre-treated municipal waste for storage. Waste incineration installations are therefore working to capacity with the waste volume incurred in Germany and do not need to take in additional waste from abroad. This will have a considerable impact on import volume, as a decline is expected. Submitted import registrations already confirm this, especially as concerns sorted waste with high organic content. However, the storage ban has no effect on the export or import of waste destined for recycling or on inorganic waste.
At present there are no concrete grounds to confirm fears that the storage ban might lead to higher exports of waste to the new EU member states. Installations with adequate capacity and technical equipment are lacking in the new EU member states. Moreover, these countries‘‘ ability to dispose of their own waste may not be jeopardized.
Total imports of hazardous wastes amounted to 1.6 mt; exports reached 195,000 tons. Export volumes of waste not requiring a license have remained stable for years at about 16 mt. In contrast, imports have been rising steadily and reached 11.6 mt in 2004
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!