Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Proposed amendments to the European Packaging directive, the new waste electronics directives, and new mercury laws passed in US states will make package labeling more complex, according to a new report Green Labeling: Global Guide for Marketers in the New Millennium from US consultants Raymond Communications.
The report finds, for example:
Proposed amendments to the EU Directive on Packaging & Packaging Waste would make the material coding mandatory for all packaging.
The new electronics directives will require new labeling on electronics for recycling.
Companies that cannot take the European Green Dot off their package for Canada may have to pay license fees to an Ontario trade association.
New mercury restrictions passed in five US states will require disclosures mercury-added products, though where it is required will vary between the states.
New international standards, and European Union rules require all wood packaging to be treated and marked because of problems with insect infestations.
Japan and Taiwan require completely different material/recycling symbols on certain packages.
The report also covers green labeling guidelines for the US and compares them to ISO and ASTM definitions.
Only English-speaking countries seem to even have clear green labeling guidelines, and only the US and perhaps the UK have ever tried to enforce such guidelines,” says publisher Michele Raymond. While fraudulent claims are rare in the US, they may continue in other countries.
The report finds that ecolabeling programmes, such as the German Blue Angel and the Nordic Swan will never harmonize with each other because of cultural differences. American industry has shied away from ecolabels because the criteria can become obsolete quickly, and may not reward innovation. However, many European and Asian countries see them as a tool of soft policy. While use of an ecolabel will not help sell products in America, an appropriate in-country label can be helpful for marketing in the “green” countries such as Germany, Austria, and the Nordic countries.
The report covers mandatory labeling in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, as well as term definitions (such as use of the term “recyclable”), and summarises ecolabel programmes globally. It provides analysis of some of the more complex issues, such as use of the Green Dot, and when and where green labels make sense.
The report will be available early November from Raymond Communications, publisher of State Recycling Laws Update and Recycling Laws International. Price: US$190.
Email: circulation@raymond.com
Int: www.raymond.com
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...