Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Expressing concern that on-farm burning of agricultural waste could more than double the UK’s emissions of dioxins, the UK Environmental Services Association ESA has written to the Minister of State (Elliot Morley MP) at DEFRA calling for a ban on open air burning of waste on farms.
“In response to a Parliamentary Question from Guildford MP Ms Sue Doughty, the Minister suggested that burning this waste is responsible for 14% of the UK’s dioxin emissions. This would be bad enough and represents 2,500% more than the dioxins released from all the UK’s regulated energy from waste facilities,” comments ESA’s Chief Executive Dirk Hazell.
“However, our own calculations based on research undertaken by officers of the United States Environmental Protection Agency shows that if 7.5% of the waste burned on-farm is PVC, the dioxin emissions from on-farm burning would be 900% higher than the figure stated by the Minister, more than doubling the UK’s total official dioxin emissions,” he added.
“This serious environmental problem arises when PVC is burned in an environment where the temperature and flow of oxygen cannot be controlled. The problem is solved when energy is extracted from PVC in a controlled and regulated environment. To safeguard human health and the environment, the Government must ban on-farm burning of plastics and similar materials,” he concluded
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...