Recycling, not incineration, best for household waste – the debate continues in Sweden

Too much waste incineration could deter efforts to reduce waste, warns an official from Sweden’s Environmental Protection Agency.



EDIE news service reports that the battle continues over whether municipal waste should be recycled or incinerated, with a director at Sweden’s EPA responding to a letter from waste experts warning that recycling and composting has no future.



Amongst the many good reasons for sorting your rubbish rather than simply burning it, Björn Södermark of the Swedish EPA told Miljöaktuellt, is the recovery of valuable resources along with reducing the volume of waste that society generates.



Incineration may be cheaper than recycling, but the latter offers energy savings in recovering metal and plastic compared with manufacturing them from raw materials, says Södermark.



The current shortage of incineration capacity means that incinerators should be reserved primarily for waste that cannot be recycled. On the other hand, if too many incinerators are built, it could discourage efforts to reduce waste, warns Södermark.



But a recent industry group warned that recycling could also destroy other measures to reduce waste, where some regulations on packaging countered efforts by the plastics industry to ‘lightweight’ packaging.

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...