Swiss Benchmark study compares five european EPAS

SWISS BENCHMARK STUDY COMPARES FIVE EUROPEAN EPAS





Switzerland enjoys an above-average quality of environment for an average level of environmental expenditure. This is achieved with a below-average number of personnel at the national environmental agency. These findings emerge in a benchmark study commissioned by SAEFL – Switzerland’s environment agency, which compared the national environmental authorities of Germany, the Netherlands, Britain, Denmark and Switzerland.





Per capita Federal spending on environmental protection in Switzerland is below the average for the countries studied. At CHF 71 per head it amounts to CHF 22 less than the average commitment of financial resources for all five countries. The number of employees at the Swiss environmental agency per 10,000 inhabitants is also below average, coming to 0.35 or just half the ratio for the five nations taken together (0.67). The Swiss agency’s personnel and workplace costs, on the other hand, are higher than average due to the high wages and cost of living in Switzerland.





Of the five countries compared, Denmark spends the most on environmental protection and Britain the least. Denmark was given the highest environmental quality rating and Britain the lowest. The benchmark study concludes from this that there is a relationship between environmental quality and the financial resources deployed. Switzerland is in-between Denmark and Britain as far as environmental expenditure is concerned, but displays the second-highest environmental quality of the five countries studied. Thus, with an average level of spending, Switzerland achieves an above-average score on quality of the environment.





The study, “Environmental Agencies in Europe”, was produced by PricewaterhouseCoopers and is the first benchmarking analysis created for this purpose

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...