According to the BioCycle/Columbia survey of municipal solid wastes (MSW), the U.S. generates nearly 400 million tons of MSW, 64% of which is landfilled. When MSW is buried in a landfill, a complex series of reactions occur in which anaerobic microorganisms decompose a portion of the organic fraction of the waste to carbon dioxide and methane. The methane produced can be collected and flared or converted to energy, which oxidizes the methane to carbon dioxide. In its Fourth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated that mitigation of methane from the world‘s landfills, by means of gas collection and utilization could reduce methane emissions from landfills globally by 70 percent at negative to low costs by 2030. In effect, IPCC recommended a waste management method that is widely employed in the United States. Unfortunately, opponents to landfill disposal too often do not differentiate between those practices that are helpful and those that are detrimental from a Climate Change perspective. When landfills are reviewed on a life-cycle basis, the negative comments from landfill opponents do not accurately portray the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from landfills in the United States, and data are often misused to suggest that landfills are collecting far less of the landfill gas (LFG) than actually is occurring nationwide. Recently, these opponents have urged policymakers not to support measures aiming to increase LFG capture and recovery. The main argument is that increased LFG capture makes composting less attractive than landfilling. The United States has a very stringent level of regulation with regard to LFG and has the highest percentage of landfills with LFG collection systems relative to any other country that practices landfilling. Because of regulatory as well as other programs that promote LFG recovery and utilization, such as the Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), nearly 60% of the worldwide capture of methane occurs in the United States even though the U.S. only generates 24% of the worldwide methane. Despite the progress made in capturing LFG, methane emissions from landfills can be further reduced by regulations and incentives that will result in additional LFG capture and utilization by means of:
Improving the design and construction of the LFG collection system to improve efficiencies,
Increasing LFG collection system efficiencies by improved cap and cover systems.
Promotion of earlier installation of gas collection systems.
It is these types of improved control measures that should be the focus of efforts to further reduce methane emissions from landfills, including any incentives, financial or otherwise, that encourage more and earlier LFG collection as well as the beneficial use of the collected LFG to create additional GHG reductions by generating renewable energy.
Organics diversion, composting, and/or other waste management options, which are sometimes viewed as alternatives to landfills, are more properly considered as complementary waste management tools. All such practices must be judged on their own merits, including cost-effectiveness, environmental impacts and operational efficiency, and not on the back of unfounded negative statements about landfills or other management options. Progress in lowering GHG emissions is best achieved by a concerted, integrated approach that employs all available technologies and methods, including reuse, recycling, composting, waste-to-energy, and landfilling with capture of LFG.
Check Also
California SB 54 Is Here: What Companies Using Plastic Packaging Need To Do Now | JD Supra
SB 54, the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act, was signed into law on June 30, 2022. Its goal is to create a framework that shifts waste management costs from the local government onto producers. To that end, SB 54 requires producers to (1) reduce the use of Covered Materials; and (2) ensure that all Covered Materials are recyclable or compostable by 2032. The definition of a producer is not 100% straightforward. You are considered a producer if you are the person who manufactures a product that uses covered material and who owns or is the licensee of the brand or trademark under which the product is used in a commercial enterprise, sold, offered for sale, or distributed in the state. [1] However, if no such person is located in California, the producer of the covered material is the owner or, if the owner is not in the state, the exclusive licensee of a brand or trademark under which the product using the covered material is used in a commercial enterprise, sold, offered for sale, or distributed in the state. [2] But if there is no such person in California either, the producer is the person who sells, offers for sale, or distributes the product that uses the covered material in or into the state. [3] To the extent you are a producer, the final regulations implementing SB 54 which went into effect May 1, 2026 have set near-term milestones with which you must comply. First, by June 1, 2026, all producers (subject to very limited exceptions) must either (1) participate in an approved Producer Responsibility Organization ( PRO ), or (2) decide to comply individually and register with CalRecycle. Depending on which path a producer decides to follow, it will also be subject to subsequent deadlines. Producers who plan to participate in an approved PRO must have a producer responsibility plan in place by June 15, 2026. If you choose to comply individually and register with CalRecycle, they must approve you, and once...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!