UK – confusion and lack of funding may hamper proper disposal of dangerous waste, say MPs

New waste policy and the landfill directive report



Uncertainty and lack of information are putting targets for reducing landfill in doubt, say the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee in a report out on March 17.



The all party group of MPs received evidence that nearly 700,000 tonnes of hazardous waste remain unaccounted for after recent changes to regulations ended the co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, which may cause serious problems. The MPs suggest this is tackled in the short term through more effective enforcement of regulation and say stronger enforcement of waste policy is essential if increased penalties are not to have the perverse effect of encouraging more illegal disposal.



The MPs say the Environment Agency needs extra funding to be able to efficiently handle the increased demands being placed on it, and particularly to tackle fly-tipping and effectively police the disposal of hazardous waste. Better information about waste streams is also needed.



The Committee remains unconvinced that Defra‘‘s ambitious targets for reducing the amount of waste going to landfill will be met and suggest that Defra needs to set out a clear strategy, complete with proper statistics on waste disposal, for how they will be achieved. Local government needs more funding, and the Government needs to established a clearer regulatory environment to ensure adequate capital investment in additional waste treatment capacity.



The Committee also calls for an increase in the landfill tax, to £35 a tonne, to increase the incentive for change and to generate additional funds to tackle waste. It supports household incentive schemes by local authorities and variable charging for household waste, among other approaches to tackling the amount of household waste put out for disposal.



Michael Jack said: “What this report confirms is that Britain continues to face an ever more complex and growing challenge about how to deal with both household and industrial waste. At the same time, compared to, for instance, climate change, this subject is in the low profile column. The Government has subcontracted the delivery of its waste policies to organisations such as the Environment Agency and local Authorities, which still seem to be short of the resources they need to make current policies on issues such as recycling and the control of fly-tipping really work. Given the limits now imposed on landfill, the Government must step forward and give real leadership in determining whether processes like incineration really can play a major role in dealing with Britain‘‘s ever-mounting volume of waste.”



This is the report‘‘s summary:



Waste policy has a lower profile than many other environmental issues, but is of great importance. The formulation and implementation of waste policy is hampered by a lack of high-quality data, while many stakeholders complain of uncertainty in the legislative and regulatory framework for waste. There are continuing concerns about the way in which EU waste legislation is negotiated and implemented. The Committee welcomes the Government‘‘s additional funding for the Environment Agency, especially to tackle fly-tipping, and for local authorities‘‘ waste management work, but it is not clear that either the Agency or local authorities have sufficient resources to match the increasing demands placed on them.



The Environment Agency should seek to reduce bureaucracy where possible, and any additional funding should be used in a way that allows it to focus on what really matters. The Committee received evidence that nearly 700,000 tonnes of hazardous waste is unaccounted for following the ending of co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. This could have a number of serious outcomes, which can be tackled in the short term through more effective enforcement of regulati