UK – confusion and lack of funding may hamper proper disposal of dangerous waste, say MPs

New waste policy and the landfill directive report



Uncertainty and lack of information are putting targets for reducing landfill in doubt, say the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee in a report out on March 17.



The all party group of MPs received evidence that nearly 700,000 tonnes of hazardous waste remain unaccounted for after recent changes to regulations ended the co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste, which may cause serious problems. The MPs suggest this is tackled in the short term through more effective enforcement of regulation and say stronger enforcement of waste policy is essential if increased penalties are not to have the perverse effect of encouraging more illegal disposal.



The MPs say the Environment Agency needs extra funding to be able to efficiently handle the increased demands being placed on it, and particularly to tackle fly-tipping and effectively police the disposal of hazardous waste. Better information about waste streams is also needed.



The Committee remains unconvinced that Defra‘‘s ambitious targets for reducing the amount of waste going to landfill will be met and suggest that Defra needs to set out a clear strategy, complete with proper statistics on waste disposal, for how they will be achieved. Local government needs more funding, and the Government needs to established a clearer regulatory environment to ensure adequate capital investment in additional waste treatment capacity.



The Committee also calls for an increase in the landfill tax, to £35 a tonne, to increase the incentive for change and to generate additional funds to tackle waste. It supports household incentive schemes by local authorities and variable charging for household waste, among other approaches to tackling the amount of household waste put out for disposal.



Michael Jack said: "What this report confirms is that Britain continues to face an ever more complex and growing challenge about how to deal with both household and industrial waste. At the same time, compared to, for instance, climate change, this subject is in the low profile column. The Government has subcontracted the delivery of its waste policies to organisations such as the Environment Agency and local Authorities, which still seem to be short of the resources they need to make current policies on issues such as recycling and the control of fly-tipping really work. Given the limits now imposed on landfill, the Government must step forward and give real leadership in determining whether processes like incineration really can play a major role in dealing with Britain‘‘s ever-mounting volume of waste."



This is the report‘‘s summary:



Waste policy has a lower profile than many other environmental issues, but is of great importance. The formulation and implementation of waste policy is hampered by a lack of high-quality data, while many stakeholders complain of uncertainty in the legislative and regulatory framework for waste. There are continuing concerns about the way in which EU waste legislation is negotiated and implemented. The Committee welcomes the Government‘‘s additional funding for the Environment Agency, especially to tackle fly-tipping, and for local authorities‘‘ waste management work, but it is not clear that either the Agency or local authorities have sufficient resources to match the increasing demands placed on them.



The Environment Agency should seek to reduce bureaucracy where possible, and any additional funding should be used in a way that allows it to focus on what really matters. The Committee received evidence that nearly 700,000 tonnes of hazardous waste is unaccounted for following the ending of co-disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. This could have a number of serious outcomes, which can be tackled in the short term through more effective enforcement of regulati

Check Also

Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains

Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...