Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Centralised treatment of food waste using methods such as in-vessel composting or anaerobic digestion can cause more greenhouse gases than household treatments using Food Waste Digesters (FWDs), says an environmental study.
MRW reports that the study titled Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Centralised and Household Treatments of Food Waste found that centralised treatment of food waste produces between 10 and 40 times more CO2 emissions than garden food waste digesters.
Speaking to MRW environmental consultant Dr Alan Knipe who wrote the study said: "The Government is favouring anaerobic digestion as a method to treat food waste because they can also get electricity out of it. But when dustcarts collect this food waste from households they are producing harmful greenhouse emissions that we can avoid.
"It is an expensive method, dirty and dangerous (collecting food waste by dustcarts). If each household had a food waste digester it will bring massive savings in reducing carbon footprint."
However, Knipe did acknowledge that not everybody could have access to food waste digesters particularly those who live in flats.
The study showed that the major contribution to the anthropogenic (man-made) greenhouse gas emissions for the centralised approach arises from the day-to-day operations of the dustcarts and the treatment plant. He found that the total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for the centralised approach range from about 50 to 214kg of CO2 equivalent per tonne of food waste. By contrast, household treatment generates around 5kg CO2 equivalent per tonne of food waste.
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...