Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Studies assessing the recycling of waste plasterboard from commercial refurbishment projects have shown that it is economically viable, according to a report published and funded by WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme).
Key findings of the report indicate that:
recovering and recycling plasterboard waste from commercial refurbishment sites is economically viable
it can be achieved by adapting existing site practices
it ensures low (or even zero) contamination in the waste collected for recycling
transferring small quantities of plasterboard to a waste transfer station, where it is bulked and then delivered to a recycler can be cost-effective for the contractor.
The WRAP funded trials, led by waste management consultants Oakdene Hollins, involved collecting waste plasterboard from city centre refurbishment projects at 13 sites across London. The aim was to help contractors overcome recycling barriers which include space constraints for skips, short project time frames, and wide variability in the volume, quality and type of plasterboard waste being generated requiring a flexible collection system.
The trial featured alternative waste management solutions to investigate the best ways to recover plasterboard waste for recycling. These included the ‘‘mosquito fleet‘‘ method, which collects small loads of waste plasterboard from sites and delivers it to a waste transfer station, using a plasterboard only skip on site, and collecting waste plasterboard for delivery direct to the recycler.
The results of the trials were extremely positive and showed that the majority of waste plasterboard generated during the strip-out and re-fit stages – such as wall partitions and ceilings – could be recovered for recycling. This could be achieved by making only small changes to existing practice. Rather than the contractors putting waste plasterboard with all other waste for disposal, they simply needed to stack it in a separate pile for collection.
The trials involved working closely with a local waste transfer station to ensure the small loads of plasterboard could be received and bulked-up, before being delivered to the recycler. Ongoing feedback was received during the trial, enabling the process to be refined. The report identified that only twenty tonnes per week needed to be bulked by the waste transfer station for the costs of recycling to be comparable to mixed landfill disposal.
The refurbishment company taking part in the trials was Overbury, part of the Morgan Sindall Group. Riccardo Rizzi, Environmental Manager for Overbury, comments: "We recognise that plasterboard waste is an issue that needs to be addressed and one that is going to grow in importance over the coming years. Being part of this trial has enabled us to get ahead of the game and discover that it is technically and commercially viable to recycle the plasterboard from our sites in London. We can now move forward to look at how we can implement this practice across all our sites. "
Dave Marsh, Construction Project Officer at WRAP, adds: "Plasterboard waste has generally been considered a low value material, but with waste disposal costs steadily rising, WRAP is developing plasterboard recycling as an alternative to landfill disposal. Until now, it was believed that collection issues prevented refurbishment companies from becoming actively involved in recycling. It‘‘s heartening to see that these trials have demonstrated the clear viability for contractors to recycle plasterboard waste from refurbishment sites of all sizes. "
Contractors and waste management companies can use the report, entitled ‘‘Recycling plasterboard waste from refurbishment sites‘‘‘‘, to access recommendations and guidance on recovering plasterboard waste during commercial refurbishments.http://www<
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...