UK – WRAP advice on helping consumers reduce fruit and vegetable waste

UK agency WRAP have published interim results from a research project examining consumer attitudes and behaviour around storage of fresh fruit & vegetables in the home. Recommendations have been givem as to how consumers and retailers can help to reduce the amounts of fresh fruit & vegetables thrown away in the home are based on a survey of current storage advice given, and an experimental research programme.

Previous research by WRAP has revealed that 6.7 million tonnes of food is thrown away by UK consumers each year, equivalent to a third of food bought. Most of this could have been eaten, and 40% (by weight) of this avoidable food waste is made up of fruit & vegetables, worth almost £3 billion. Almost 90% of this fruit & vegetable waste consists of fresh produce, about 1.4 million tonnes, and most is thrown away as a result of not being used in time (before going off or out of date). For example the top five fruit and vegetables which get thrown away whole, without being touched are:

§ Apples – 4.4 million per day

§ Potatoes – 5.1 million per day

§ Bananas – 1.6 million per day

§ Tomatoes – 2.8 million per day

§ Oranges – 1.2 million per day

The environmental, financial and health implications of so much fresh produce being thrown away makes this category one of the priorities for WRAP and the Love Food Hate Waste campaign. WRAP issued an open call for applications to its Innovation Fund in March 2007, for projects that would help reduce the amount of food thrown away by households in the UK. This project, led by East Malling Research, was one of the successful submissions.

The objectives of the project were:

§ Gaining information from consumers on how they currently manage the storage of fresh fruit and vegetables in the home, on the types of products that are commonly wasted and the reason for rejection.

§ Assembling an easy to understand scale of relative perishability for different types of fruits and vegetables, to aid the consumer with best storage practice.

§ Developing and testing simple methods to prolong the freshness of fruit and vegetables in the home.

§ Reviewing the advice given by the major retailers to consumers about storage of fresh fruit and vegetables and suggesting improvements.

§ Providing information to WRAP and retailers to advise consumers about methods to ensure they consume a higher proportion of the products they purchase.

The project is not due to complete and report until June 2008 but findings from the early consumer and experimental research, together with the retailer survey, suggested that there was a need to highlight key findings as soon as practicable.

Consumer research

This research was designed and executed with the objective of gaining information as to how consumers manage the storage of fresh fruits and vegetables in the home and to comment on the types of products that are commonly wasted and to determine why. The study had three parts: an attitude questionnaire; a daily diary of fruits and vegetables purchase, transport, storage and wastage over one week; and a spot check audit of fridge contents. 297 householders completed the survey, and 273 the diary. The fieldwork was carried out in August and September 2007.

§ The diary revealed that 40% of fruit by weight is stored fruit in the fridge; 60% elsewhere (56% in fruit bowl). In comparison 75% of vegetables were stored in the fridge.

§ The most commonly stated reasons for throwing away fruit and vegetables was that they were perceived to be mouldy slimy or ‘off’ in terms of appearance or texture.

In a separate piece of research WRAP commissioned Exodus Research to conduct 1001 telephone-based interviews to explore consumer behaviour around food storage (“Food Storage and Packaging, 2007”). This research found that:

§ only 23% – 28% of people would store fruit in the fridge

§ 65 to 70% would store fruit in the fruit bowl

§ 53% – 57% would store vegetables in the fridge.

Based on the consumer research undertaken by RSSL as part of this project we know where consumers are currently storing different types of fruit & vegetables. Comparing this to the recommendations based on the experimental research (and expert advice – see below), and knowing how much fruit and vegetables are purchased in the UK (from Defra’s Family Food & Expenditure Survey 2005/6 (http://statistics.defra.gov.uk/esg/publications/efs/default.asp)) we can estimate that:

At least 1.2 million tonnes of fruit & vegetables are being stored outside of the fridge that would benefit from being kept cool.
Even if 5% of this could be eaten rather than thrown away that would mean 60,000t less waste.

Conversely there are fruits & vegetables, such as bananas and pineapples, that are best stored outside of the fridge, but the research revealed that some consumers were unaware of this. For example 6% of bananas were stored in the fridge – equivalent to over 40,000t.

Conclusions and recommendations

It is well known in the fresh produce industry that most fruit & vegetables keep longer at low temperatures (and high humidity), and where advice is currently being given to consumers it is largely consistent with this. For example many pre-packed apples do carry storage advice along the lines of “refrigerate for freshness” or “keep refrigerated”.

However this research has revealed that in some cases this advice is not given on pre-packed produce, in very few cases is any advice given on how to store produce bought loose and little advice is currently available on retail websites. The survey (of five of the main UK retailers) revealed that advice was given on most pre-packed produce by most of the retailers (four of the five had storage information on more than 85% of pre-packed fresh fruit & vegetables; but one had storage information on only 37% of these products), but the situation was very different for fresh fruit & vegetables sold loose (free flow). The five retailers gave storage advice on only 6 – 19% (average 7%) of loose produce.

Many consumers are unaware of storage advice, or of the benefits of following this advice, and there is a clear need to ensure that the correct storage advice is available to all consumers, regardless of how or where they shop.

These new research findings have highlighted an opportunity for retailers to enable their customers to get more out of their fresh fruit & vegetables, by:

§ Reviewing the advice currently given to customers, on-pack, in-store and on-line.

§ Introducing advice where it is lacking, and making all advice clear and prominent.

§ Complementing this basic storage advice with relevant tips and information (for example recipes).

In support of the Love Food Hate Waste Campaign, and as part of this research project, Sainsbury’s is trialling new storage guidance to customers both in store and on its website.

Ano da Publicação: 2009
Fonte: WARMER BULLETIN ENEWS #17-2008-May 02, 2008
Autor: Kit Strange/Warmer Bulletin
Email do Autor: bulletin@residua.com

Check Also

Isopor, é possível reciclar

BY RICARDO RICCHINIIN RECICLAGEM DE ISOPOR — 14 JAN, 2015 Maioria dos brasileiros não sabe …

Generic selectors
Pesquisar o termo exato
Procurar em títulos
Procurar nos conteúdos
Filtrar por categorias:
Thermal Treatment
Bioreatores
Vazadouros
Resíduo Proveniente da Serragem de Rochas Graníticas
Centrais de Reciclagem
Resíduos de Madeira
Reciclagem de vidro
Reciclagem de Isopor
Resíduos Gasosos
Aproveitamento energético do biogás
Estações de Transferência/Waste Transfer Stations
Privatization of Public Services
Accidents in the waste industry
Leachate treatment
Plásticos no lixo urbano; caracterização
Gestão de limpeza urbana
Entulhos de Obras de Construção Civil
Biovidros
Resíduos Sólidos de Construção e Demolição
Cimento amianto
Aterros industriais
Resíduos Agrícolas
Combustíveis
Geomembranas
Hospital Waste
Environmental Remediation
Waste sorting plant
Packaging
recuperação e reciclagem
Gerenciamento de Resíduos
Resíduos de Gesso
Biotecnologia
Gestão de Resíduos de Produtos Eletro-eletrônicos
Licenciamento Ambiental
Reciclagem - Estudos de Caso
Resíduos Espaciais
Zero Waste
Indicadores da Limpeza Urbana
Solid Waste in the United States
Acondicionamento
Waste to Fuel
Patrocinadores
Solid Waste Management
Meio Ambiente
Biodigestão
Reciclagem de Lâmpadas
Metais
Emissões Gasosas
Reciclagem de cobre
Resíduos de Dragagem
Sustentabilidade
Pavimentação
Recycling Technologies
Aviation
Food waste
Ciclo de vida dos produtos
Ação Civil Pública
Resíduos de Saúde
O estado de consumo
Embalagens de agrotóxicos
Recuperação de áreas degradadas
Estória
Qualidade Ambiental (Environmental Quality)
Gases Efeito Estufa
Aproveitamento energético dos RSU através de tratamento térmico
Polymeric Composite Materials
Green house gases
Wood waste
Aluminum Recycling
e-waste
Análise de Custo de Resíduos Sólidos
Energia
Composição dos Resíduos
Gravimetria
Co-processamento
Poluição ambiental
Veículos em fim de vida
Financiamento
Biodegradable Materials
Greenhouse gas emissions
Marine debris
Últimas Notícias
Greenhouse gases
Mudanças Climáticas
Reciclagem de Embalagem Tetra Pak
Carvão feito de lixo
Chorume - Gera��o
Reciclagem de CD's
Waste-to-energy
Poluição Atmosférica
Medicamentos
Consórcios
Gasification
Mechanical Biological Treatment - MBT
Public participation
Latest News
Bioreactor
Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde
Agenda 21
Plano de Gerenciamento de Resíduos
Coco
Saúde
Reciclagem de óleo
Biocombustíveis
Waste Treatment
Organic Waste
Reciclagem de Carpetes
Solar Energy at Landfill Sites
Reverse Process
Las Últimas
Compostagem
Reciclagem de entulho e restos de obras
Geração de Resíduos
Biodegradabilidade
Gari
Reciclagem de alumínio
Sistemas de Informações Geográficas - SIG
Resíduos Plásticos
Casca de coco
waste collection
Perigos do Lixo
Informal Sector
open dump
Cartilhas
Composto Orgânico
Cestas Coletoras (papeleiras)
Biodiesel
Resíduos da Construção Civil
Metais Pesados
Life Cycle
Pirólise
Legislação
Planos de Gestão de Resíduos
Panorama dos Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil
Hazardous Wastes
Waste Management Indicators
Textile recycling
Curiosidades
Pesquisa Nacional sobre Saneamento Básico
Saneamento básico
Redução e Reciclagem de lixo
Licitações Públicas
Reciclagem de Madeira
Biometano
Madeira Plástica
Reciclagem de CD’s
Resíduos Agrossilvopastoris
Corona
Leachate
Landfill
Construction and demolition waste
Eventos
Links
Embalagens
Pneus
Vidro
Preços de Materiais Recicláveis
Histórias
Estudos de caso
Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo - MDL
Manuais
Planos Municipais de Gestão Integrada de Resíduos
Indicadores ambientais
Anaerobic Digestion
Renewable Energy
China
Biodegradable Municipal Waste
Economia
Limpeza Urbana
Como Fazer...
Biomassa
Baling
Catadores de lixo
Reciclagem de lodo
Reflorestamento
Reciclagem de Veículos
COVID 19
Liner
Food Recovery
Biomethanization
Recycling
Reciclagem de Produtos Eletro-eletrônicos
Responsabilidade Social Corporativa
Inventário de Resíduos Sólidos
Impactos do Lixo
Tratamento e Biorremediação
Gestão Empresarial e Pública
Sacolas plásticas
Landfill Gas to Energy
Resíduos Orgânicos
Valorização Energética
Landfill recovery and restoration
Waste Characterization
Biodegradable plastic
Waste Minimization
PNSB - Pesquisa Nacional de Saneamento Básico
Lixo no Mar
Estatísticas
Educação Ambiental
Políticas Públicas - Aterros Sanitários
Metano
Necrochorume
Lixo Espacial
Reciclagem Têxtil
Marco Legal do Saneamento Básico
Fuel Cells
Circular Economy
Obsolecência planejada
Sanitary Landfill
Recuperação Energética dos Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos
Chorume - Geração
Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Seleção de Áreas para Destino Final de Resíduos
Políticas Públicas
Efeito Estufa
Simbologias de Materiais Recicláveis
Reciclagem de aço
Resíduos de Transporte
PLANARES - Plano Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos
Climate Change
Tranfer Station
Deck Lights
Licitações
Galeria de Fotos
Curiosidades
Especificações Técnicas
Vídeos
Trabalhos Técnicos
Bibliografia

More results...