Seeking data for future regulation, the US government has told factory-style farms that generate huge amounts of animal waste they can escape potentially large fines if their air pollution is monitored.
Associated Press reports that the offer by the Environmental Protection Agency is intended to produce the air-quality data needed for setting air-pollution standards for thousands of animal-processing farms, particularly hog, chicken, and egg operations.
By signing on, the farms, increasingly run by a concentrated few companies, pay US$2,500 into an EPA fund and agree to let EPA-approved contractors monitor the air.
Companies also would have to agree to pay a civil penalty of anywhere from US$200 to 100,000, depending on the size and number of farms they operate. Those fines would cover presumed violations, past and present, and fend off potential liability four years into the future, when EPA expects to issue its air standards.
Without the deal, EPA officials said, the air standards probably would take a decade or more to complete.
‘‘‘‘This is not a ‘‘pay up and get out of jail free‘‘ pass," said Thomas V. Skinner, EPA‘‘s acting chief of enforcement.
Environmentalists described EPA‘‘s offer as a ‘‘‘‘backroom deal" that will harm public health.
‘‘‘‘Rural families have been suffering from this pollution for years, and now they will have to wait," said Ed Hopkins, environmental quality director for the Sierra Club. ‘‘‘‘This is an agreement of the polluters, by the polluters, and for the polluters."
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!