In terms of litter on the city‘‘s streets, chewing gum is public enemy number one. It accounts for an astonishing 39 percent of all small litter citywide. Of litter emblazoned with a brand name, the top repeat offender is packaging from McDonalds.
These are just two of the findings in the City‘‘s first-ever litter audit conducted in San Francisco and announced by Mayor Gavin Newsom.
The audit – commissioned by the Department of the Environment and supported by the Department of Public Works- catalogued various categories of litter at 105 randomly selected sites in order to establish citywide averages and trends. The information developed in the audit will help target litter reduction efforts, and provides a baseline to measure future performance in subsequent audits.
"The Streets Litter Audit allows us to identify the business sectors that are the greatest source of litter, as well as the types of public behavior that we need to change," said Mayor Newsom. "Now that we can pinpoint where the City‘‘s litter is coming from, I am committed to reducing street litter in San Francisco by fifty percent over the next five years."
"The Streets Litter Audit compiled data on small litter, large litter, and where this litter occurred," noted Department of the Environment Director Jared Blumenfeld. "From this data, we can identify the most commonly littered items-and we call this list San Francisco‘‘s Dirty Dozen."
The Dirty Dozen is the six most found items and six most found brands. In order of frequency, the top six items are gum, paper (receipts, napkins and newspapers), broken glass, plastic, candy wrappers, cigarette butts and empty cigarette packs. The top six brands are McDonalds, Muni transfers, Marlboro, Burger King, Starbucks, and, tied for sixth place, Safeway, FedEx, and Jack in the Box. Fast food restaurants account for the greatest amount of litter generated by the Dirty Dozen.
"Individuals have the responsibility not to drop litter on the streets, but the business sector also needs to examine its practices that feed the problem," said Mayor Newsom. "Since much of the litter comes from fast food establishments and cafes, we need these businesses to take responsibility for the amount of packaging they use. Just reducing the number of paper napkins in a to-go order would make a significant positive impact. That‘‘s why I will be calling a meeting with fast food franchise owners to secure their commitment to our litter reduction goals."
The city will also undertake immediate action to reduce litter by looking into changing the business license renewal process to require that each business, when renewing its business license, show proof that it has refuse collection services. Additionally, the City will be launching Don‘‘t Litter educational campaigns with Muni and supporting existing programs with the School District.
In the past year, San Francisco enacted legislation banning foamed polystyrene foodservice containers in favor of compostable or recyclable containers, and banned non-compostable plastic checkout bags at supermarkets and drugstores. These initiatives will reduce litter, and are significant in that they hold the entities that produce the waste stream responsible for cleaning it up.
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!