Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!
Mayor Greg Nickels of Seattle has rolled out an ambitious plan to further reduce the amount of garbage being sent to landfills, increase recycling and to rebuild the city‘‘s two aging transfer stations. He is also eyeing up the prospects for banning plastic bags and styrofoam.
Under the agreement – prompted by a Council study of Seattle‘‘s recycling potential and the need for new or renovated recycling and disposal stations – Mayor Nickels has committed to substantially increasing the city-wide recycling rate while limiting the amount of garbage being sent to the city‘‘s disposal facilities. In addition, the agreement will not add a new truck-to-rail garbage transfer station in south Seattle.
"Seattle Public Utilities and the City Council have identified a number of strategies that could enable Seattle to move beyond our current goal of 60 percent recycling, to the very cutting edge of recycling and waste reduction, " Nickels said. "This can play a key role in our efforts to reduce climate-changing pollution. Every pound we recycle reduces greenhouse gas emissions by two to three pounds. "
Key provisions of the agreement include:
reconfiguring and rebuilding the existing Wallingford and South Park stations to increase operational efficiency. Constructed in the 1960s, the stations are outdated, subject to frequent breakdowns, and lacking in adequate environmental controls to meet the city‘‘s current and future solid waste and recycling goals.
increasing the city‘‘s long-term recycling goal beyond the current 60 percent objective to about 70 percent by 2025.
establishing a waste reduction goal that would limit the amount of garbage Seattle sends to the landfill in future years at 440,000 tons – the amount of garbage the city disposed of in 2006.
expanding yard and food waste collection service to single-family households by 2009.
conducting a study of products, packages and ingredients which could be banned, such as plastic bags and Styrofoam. This study will include: identification of potential products, packages and/or ingredients that could be banned in the near future; the costs and benefits for individual bans; criteria for evaluating bans; and an evaluation of available substitutes for anything proposed to be banned.
increasing reuse, waste reduction and recycling of construction demolition waste through the modification of the city‘‘s current demolition permit by the end of 2008. SPU will work with the Seattle Department of Planning and Development to accomplish this and explore incentives and disincentives to developers and contractors to accomplish waste reduction goals.
"Some of these new opportunities will require people to make an extra effort, " Nickels said. "If we succeed, we can reach a recycling rate of about 70 percent by the year 2025. That would save more resources and eliminate millions of pounds of greenhouse gases. "
"The people of Seattle are passionate about wanting a solid-waste strategy that embodies their environment values. I‘‘m very pleased that the Mayor and I have found a way to do that, " Conlin said.
Beginning in 1998 the City Council made a series of policy decisions regarding recycling levels, waste reduction and additional facilities. Those decisions led to SPU‘‘s recommendation to upgrade the current transfer stations, while adding a new truck-to-rail garbage transfer station on Corgiat Avenue, south of Georgetown.
Upon receiving SPU‘‘s recommendation, however, Councilmembers decided against building the new intermodal facility.
Seattle has had a long-established goal of recycling 60 percent of all the waste generated by its residents and businesses. In 2002, the city‘‘s recycling rate had stagnated at less than 38 perce
Artigos Relacionados
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...