Dow Jones reports that the world‘‘s energy industry has never been keener to tap the commercial potential of natural gas. But some nations are wasting more gas than ever before as producers burn it off straight into the atmosphere.
A World Bank-financed study released this month found the industry burned off, or "flared," about $40 billion worth of gas globally in 2006, up 14% from 2004, in part due to higher oil and gas prices. The study also found that 22 countries, including Russia and China, flare much more gas today than a decade ago as companies pump more oil from new and more remote areas of the world.
Flaring is a decades-old industry practice used to dispose of natural gas that is often found with deposits of crude oil but can‘‘t easily be used for economic activities because of a lack of pipelines and other infrastructure. The process is similar to the flame flowing from a cigarette lighter magnified a thousand times.
The World Bank says flaring accounts for just 2% of the total carbon emissions believed to help cause global warming. But that number masks the damage flaring does to local environments and the irritation it causes people with asthma and other respiratory ailments. This is now causing serious concern in the world‘‘s top flaring countries, Nigeria and Russia, which together flared at least $16 billion worth of gas in 2006, according to industry data. Both countries say they‘‘ll soon force all energy firms to stop flaring. "Such squandering cannot be tolerated," Russian President Vladimir Putin was quoted on the Kremlin‘‘s Web site as telling Russian state energy firms last month.
President Putin has said bigger ecological penalties and tougher demands on producers in oil development licenses could end flaring. Analysts say they have little reason to doubt Russia‘‘s resolve to sharply cut flaring in light of the firm manner in which the Kremlin has dealt with foreign oil companies in recent years.
Indeed, flaring has dropped sharply in recent years in countries like Norway and Canada. A stiff carbon tax, for example, implemented in the 1990s in Norway has been enough of a penalty to substantially cut the amount of gas burned off there. Even in Nigeria, long the worst flaring country in the world, big reductions have been achieved with the rise of gas exporting projects, though it is still the largest flarer in the world alongside Russia. Attracted by the profit-potential in rising gas prices, the energy industry globally spent $56 billion from 2001 to 2005 globally on projects aimed at producing gas-derived consumer goods like plastics and exporting gas, according to the International Energy Agency. Gas is also used more today for producing electricity because it burns more efficiently and pollutes less than other fossil fuels.
Russia, for example, has seen the biggest increase in flaring of any country the past decade as its energy industry recovers from its dilapidated post-Cold War state and company‘‘s invest billions of dollars in new oil and gas production.
"It‘‘s been difficult to reduce the overall quantity of gas flared because oil production worldwide has increased the past 20 years," says Bent Svensson, who leads the World Bank‘‘s Global Gas Flaring Reduction program. Global oil production last year was about 85 million barrels a day, up around 25% from 1992.
A big reason for this is that private and state firms are drilling for oil in more distant and remote places in the world, like at sea, where no infrastructure exists to deliver the accompanying natural gas economically to markets.
Energy companies say building pipelines and other facilities to commercialize all the gas produced alongside oil can be too costly, so they burn off a lot of it from the drilling site. They also re
Check Also
Waste management poses challenges, but could unlock major environmental and economic gains
Every day, the city of Rio de Janeiro, one of the largest metropolises in the Southern Hemisphere, generates 17,000 tonnes of waste, ranging from large industrial debris to candy wrappers bought innocently at newspaper stands. While this waste presents a serious and urgent environmental challenge, it also fuels an increasingly significant portion of the economy, with benefits extending beyond financial gains. - When we look at developed European countries, many are already recycling between 40% and 50%, with some reaching 60%. From an economic standpoint, both recyclable materials and organic waste hold tremendous value - stated Adalberto Maluf, National Secretary for Environment and Environmental Quality at the Ministry of the Environment (MMA), during the Methane Forum: Climate Emergency Brake, at the Rio Nature and Climate Week. Citing a 2025 report, Maluf mentioned that Brazil literally throws away R$27 billion annually, while municipalities spend significantly more - R$45 billion - managing all this waste, often overlooking the environmental impact or economic potential buried in landfills and dumps. - We spend R$45 billion to collect and dispose of waste in landfills, yet we manage to recycle less than a third of the potential. I believe it will be necessary to review contracts, create performance-based remuneration mechanisms, and pay for both effectively sorted materials and those diverted from landfills - he added. According to the IBGE, 60.5% of Brazilian municipalities adopt some form of selective waste collection, and several initiatives serve as examples of how to manage city waste. In his panel presentation, Bernardo Ornelas, Project Coordinator at the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Urban Cleaning Company (Comlurb), highlighted Ecoparque do Caju, a national benchmark in waste management and recycling. There, received materials are sorted and can be used for biogas production, organic compounds for urban gardens, or human consumption, in the case of still...
Web-Resol Tudo sobre Limpeza Urbana e Resíduos Sólidos!